Few days back i had posted on fb ' Just wondering if men get 1-3 months paid leave ? Don't they ever want or need long paid leaves in their 25-35 yrs of working life ?'
I thought about this while sharing my views on another topic with one of my fb freind had put . Happen to read this piece of news today ''On Thursday (Sept 8th) professional-services firm Deloitte LLP is announcing that it will offer up to 16 weeks of fully paid leave for a wide range of caregiving, including maternity and paternity leave, eldercare and aid for other sick family members or partners.'
http://www.wsj.com/articles/deloitte-to-offer-paid-leave-for-elder-caregiving-1473336000?mod=e2fb
“The 6 month maternity leave. I am curious . Having a child is a conscious choice that most women exercise. To expect other agencies to participate in that decision and "pay the price" for the same seems a bit unfair, no? In an economy that is already struggling , to stall work for long periods of time will only hurt us, wont it? Instead, could we not have thought about better child care options at work place, greater involvement of fathers and so on? So everyone wins?”
I thought about this while sharing my views on another topic with one of my fb freind had put . Happen to read this piece of news today ''On Thursday (Sept 8th) professional-services firm Deloitte LLP is announcing that it will offer up to 16 weeks of fully paid leave for a wide range of caregiving, including maternity and paternity leave, eldercare and aid for other sick family members or partners.'
http://www.wsj.com/articles/deloitte-to-offer-paid-leave-for-elder-caregiving-1473336000?mod=e2fb
“The 6 month maternity leave. I am curious . Having a child is a conscious choice that most women exercise. To expect other agencies to participate in that decision and "pay the price" for the same seems a bit unfair, no? In an economy that is already struggling , to stall work for long periods of time will only hurt us, wont it? Instead, could we not have thought about better child care options at work place, greater involvement of fathers and so on? So everyone wins?”
This was one of the topic of discussion on Fb posted by one
of my fb friend – and I completely agree to her point that why should other
agencies be made to ‘Pay the price’ . But before I go on with my opinion – let
me declare, my view are based on my personal experience and yes it lacks wider vision
on who or which section of the society would actually benefit from this rule.
I have been part of IT professional work force, working in
Private and MNC companies,where we get 3 months of paid maternity leave and
probably 1-3 months of unpaid leaves. Being in this industry since 98 and I
know how demanding the projects and work can be. How much managers are under
pressure to get the project done at the scheduled deadlines with limited human resources.
Many of the project duration is between 6 -12 months, the difficulty in getting
the right mix of skills resources, the challenges to find a stable replacement
and endless checkpoints which manager has to take care of for the team members. Now in the team which is
already into very tight schedule comes a lady , and within one month time manager
is tod that she is pregnant – morning
sickness and other issues related to first trimester (worst scenario- bed rest
candidates), manager cannot release the rlady out of the project as it will be
considered discrimination, also any backup or extra resource to fill up the gap
will be extra financial burden and manager might not have that budget/option.
Now when we say 3 months or 6 months of maternity leave – 6
months from when? Say the lady needs bed rest from first trimester itself – so
she takes 6 months leave, assuming that , this cover the 9 months , can she
join soon after Delivery ? No, so what is company expected to do ? Continue the
leave as without pay leave? Btw why should company invest so much on a
resource, when there is no guarantee that resource will join back to work after
the maternity break ? Or even if she joins back might have utilization
challenges? Work from home is an option,
but note that unless the resource is work wise independent (that is requires no
guidance/overseeing) WFH option is again not productive, also there are times
when its not feasible also . Now if the company decides to let go the resource
that again becomes discrimination against women, pregnant women! As it is many
managers avoid young women – you would hear this more often, if possible take
males,as there would be long hours and late nights …. We cannot take the risks
associated with young women getting married/pregnant in between … now 6 months
paid leave … that’s going to be extra financial burden. Probably the companies
would now come up with policies like ‘atleast 1 year of service with the
company to avail paid maternity leave ..
Now take another situation – you have a male employee, he is one
you your good resources. And god forbids, he is diagnosed with tumour or cancer
and requires 6 months of Chemo therapy or surgery and 6 months rest – What does the policy say?And
say this guy is the only earning member
of the family and is father of an infant – will he get 6 months paid Leave ?
and after that 6 months would he have the surety that he will have the job ?Another situation where this guy's spouse or child or mom or dad needs medical attention and he is the only one to take care and needs 3-6 months break, would he be given paid leave? Is
it not discrimination against men? When is that they get to take long 2-3 months paid
leave for personal/medical reasons?
Another case – The house help lady who comes in your home for
daily chores – she has been working for you for last 5 yrs , and then she gets
married and becomes pregnant , would you give her 6 months paid leave? Would
you not work out your budget and smooth functioning of chores at home which
would mean you would look for replacement and you will try to negotiate the
wages and would also mean you would ‘Let Go’ your current house help of 5 yrs ?
How many of us would think of at least help financially for medical needs of
the Lady ? Forget pregnancy, say 50 yrs old lady working for you , meets with
an accident and has multiple fracture and needs 6 months recovery time, would
you think of paying 6 months salary to her ? When I put myself in these
situation where I am the employer – my answer is ‘No’ even though I would like
to do the right thing of paying for 6 months or financial help in the medical
needs, but I have my own limitations and restrictions and I cannot and will not
pay for even 3 months forget 6 months … That’s the fact . So now should I expect my employer to pay me for 6 months ?
Yes I agree that pregnancy, going through whole lot of pain , and the physiological, pschycological, financial, social family changes it brings in women’s life is just too much that 3 months is not enough , but expecting third party to share the expense for 6 months of the changes which comes in your life , am not sure if it is correct … You need to plan for things .. even when things are unplanned …
I think this rule can work fine in Government set up, where
people have 9-5 job (in kerela its 10:30 to 4) and they get benefits of steady
and stable job. Infact in Kerala govt employees have the option of taking leave
for 5 yrs and work abroad or in private company and come back and join or
extend the leave if possible and still be eligible for all the after retirement
benefits. So you see lot of peole who have taken leave from their govt jos and
working in private IT (and other fields) companies – they get the best of both
the worlds J That’s what – one need to plan and work out
things to their advantage J
Though I agree 6 months maternity is good to have as policy for better future of children , but the fact
remains that in cities the percentage of mother breast feeding even for first 3
months is Very low . Rural India I must admit I ve no idea how much this rule
will help. Being mother of 2, for my elder one I took break from
job and she was on exclusive breast feed or 6 months when she was 8 months old
I joined back , I had to take a new job. After 6 years , i had a miscarriage and again i was entitled for 45 days paid leave, after 30 days I was back at work.(I found going back to work a good therapy to overcome my depression). For my 2 child (which happened after 7 years of my first delivery) I was working till the
previous day of delivery, I joined back after 4 months used to pump milk and on
long days had to depend on supplements , Also I had too engage a nanny who
would stay till 6 pm and then if I don’t reach back by 6 my husband you to take
over .Though the intentions are good but not sure how much this rule will
actually help in getting the desired result in terms of investment in future
and GDP, and I feel 3 months paid leave is fair enough … Many might get a feel that I am being too
biased or tough ,insensitive but,I have seen many women at work misusing/manipulating
the leave privileges which they get ….
"A girl should not expect special privileges because of her sex, but neither should she "adjust" to prejudice and discrimination." - Betty Friedan
No comments:
Post a Comment